#FHETrack
93
0
1
0
JCUSER-efxs8yPn
JCUSER-efxs8yPn2025-12-15 12:59
New Player in FHE Privacy Track: Octra Enters at $200 million Valuation to Challenge Zama

New Player in FHE Privacy Track: Octra Enters at $200 million Valuation to Challenge ZamaOutside of FHE (full homomorphic encryption) privacy track giant Zama (valued at $1 billion), new project Octra is launching a token sale at a fully diluted valuation of $200 million to join the competition.Key differences:

  1. Technical path: Octra uses a completely self-developed FHE technology stack, while Zama and others provide more general FHE solutions. This may be an advantage (more controllable) or a risk (longer validation).
  2. Application positioning: Not only to create an independent privacy public chain, but also to emphasize as a "coprocessor" for existing mainstream chains. This may be a more practical ecosystem entry strategy.
  3. Performance Claims: Its testnet peak throughput (17,000 TPS) and processed transaction volume (over 100 million) data is designed to demonstrate the usability of its technology.

Thinking: Against the backdrop of privacy becoming a rigid demand, the FHE track is far from being finalized. Can Octra's "self-developed" story and relatively low valuation attract developers and capital attention, thus competing with giants?Project comparison and details:https://blog.ju.com/octra-fhe-blockchain-token-sale/?utm_source=blog #FHETrack #Competition #Privacy #Blockchain

93
0
Background
Avatar

JCUSER-efxs8yPn

2025-12-15 13:07

New Player in FHE Privacy Track: Octra Enters at $200 million Valuation to Challenge Zama

[{"type":"paragraph","children":[{"text":"New Player in FHE Privacy Track: Octra Enters at $200 million Valuation to Challenge ZamaOutside of FHE (full homomorphic encryption) privacy track giant Zama (valued at $1 billion), new project Octra is launching a token sale at a fully diluted valuation of $200 million to join the competition.Key differences:"}]},{"type":"numbered-list","children":[{"type":"list-item","children":[{"text":"Technical path: Octra uses a completely self-developed FHE technology stack, while Zama and others provide more general FHE solutions. This may be an advantage (more controllable) or a risk (longer validation)."}]},{"type":"list-item","children":[{"text":"Application positioning: Not only to create an independent privacy public chain, but also to emphasize as a \"coprocessor\" for existing mainstream chains. This may be a more practical ecosystem entry strategy."}]},{"type":"list-item","children":[{"text":"Performance Claims: Its testnet peak throughput (17,000 TPS) and processed transaction volume (over 100 million) data is designed to demonstrate the usability of its technology."}]}]},{"type":"paragraph","children":[{"text":"Thinking: Against the backdrop of privacy becoming a rigid demand, the FHE track is far from being finalized. Can Octra's \"self-developed\" story and relatively low valuation attract developers and capital attention, thus competing with giants?Project comparison and details:"},{"type":"link","url":"https://blog.ju.com/octra-fhe-blockchain-token-sale/?utm_source=blog","children":[{"text":"https://blog.ju.com/octra-fhe-blockchain-token-sale/?utm_source=blog"}]},{"text":""},{"type":"link","url":"https://blog.ju.com/octra-fhe-blockchain-token-sale/?utm_source=blog","children":[{"text":""}]},{"text":"\n"},{"type":"topic","character":"FHETrack","children":[{"text":""}]},{"text":" "},{"type":"topic","character":"Competition","children":[{"text":""}]},{"text":" "},{"type":"topic","character":"Privacy","children":[{"text":""}]},{"text":" "},{"type":"topic","character":"Blockchain","children":[{"text":""}]},{"text":" "}]}]
JU Square

Tuyên bố miễn trừ trách nhiệm:Chứa nội dung của bên thứ ba. Không phải lời khuyên tài chính.
Xem Điều khoản và Điều kiện.

Không có dữ liệu thêm